<!-- start tips -->
Please check the following:
1. Make sure you are targeting the `main` branch, pull requests on release branches are only allowed for backports.
2. Make sure you have read contributing guidelines: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md .
3. For documentations contribution, please go to https://gitea.com/gitea/docs
4. Describe what your pull request does and which issue you're targeting (if any).
5. It is recommended to enable "Allow edits by maintainers", so maintainers can help more easily.
6. Your input here will be included in the commit message when this PR has been merged. If you don't want some content to be included, please separate them with a line like `---`.
7. Delete all these tips before posting.
<!-- end tips -->
Co-authored-by: 孟宁 <mengning997@163.com>
Co-authored-by: panshuxiao <panshuxiao@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Co-authored-by: jiaojm <13763605353@163.com>
Co-authored-by: 24焦俊鸣 <13763605353@163.com>
Reviewed-on: #21
Co-authored-by: mengning <mengning@mengning.com.cn>
Co-committed-by: mengning <mengning@mengning.com.cn>
This PR adds a feature to direct users to appropriate pages after system
installation:
- If no admin credentials were provided during installation, redirect to
the registration page with a prominent notice about creating the first
administrative account
- If admin credentials were already set, redirect directly to the login
page
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This fixes 3 issues I encountered when debugging problems with our LDAP sync:
1. The comparison of the hashed image data in `IsUploadAvatarChanged` is
wrong. It seems to be from before avatar hashing was changed and unified
in #22289. This results in the function always returning `true` for any
avatars, even if they weren't changed.
2. Even if there's no avatar to upload (i.e. no avatar available for the
LDAP entry), the upload function would still be called for every single
user, only to then fail, because the data isn't valid. This is
unnecessary.
3. Another small issue is that the comparison function (and thus hashing
of data) is called for every user, even if there is no avatar attribute
configured at all for the LDAP source. Thus, I switched the condition
nesting, so that no cycles are wasted when avatar sync isn't configured
in the first place.
I also added a trace log for when there is actually a new avatar being
uploaded for an existing user, which is now only shown when that is
actually the case.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR changes the `opts` argument in `SearchUsers()` to be passed by
value instead of by pointer, as its mutations do not escape the function
scope and are not used elsewhere. This simplifies reasoning about the
function and avoids unnecessary pointer usage.
This insight emerged during an initial attempt to refactor
`RenderUserSearch()`, which currently intermixes multiple concerns.
Co-authored-by: Philip Peterson <philip-peterson@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds the label _state_ to the metric _gitea_users_. With the
change, _gitea_users_ would be reported like this:
```
...
# HELP gitea_users Number of Users
# TYPE gitea_users gauge
gitea_users{state="active"} 20
gitea_users{state="inactive"} 10
...
```
The metrics above would be from a Gitea instance with 30 user accounts.
20 of the accounts are active and 10 of the accounts are not active.
Resolve#34325
When list commits, some of the commits authors are the same at many
situations. But current logic will always fetch the same GPG keys from
database. This PR will cache the GPG keys, emails and users for the
context so that reducing the database queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR tries to finally fix the bug mentioned in #30011 and #15504,
where the user repo limit is checked when creating a repo in an
organization.
Fix#30011
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
1. Ignore empty inputs in `UnmarshalHandleDoubleEncode`
2. Ignore non-existing `stateEvent.User` in gitlab migration
3. Enable `release` and `wiki` units when they are selected in migration
4. Sanitize repo name for migration and new repo
Resolve#29328
This pull request introduces a file tree on the left side when reviewing
files of a repository.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Replace all contexts in tests with go1.24 t.Context()
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
When listing commits, Gitea attempts to retrieve the actual user based
on the commit email. Querying users one by one from the database is
inefficient. This PR optimizes the process by batch querying users by
email, reducing the number of database queries.
1. add `GetSiteCookieFlashMessage` to help to parse flash message
2. clarify `handleRepoHomeFeed` logic
3. remove unnecessary global variables, use `sync.OnceValue` instead
4. add some tests for `IsUsableUsername` and `IsUsableRepoName`
This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes.
First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as
the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea
to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking
change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up).
I've used [this
approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html)
to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both
the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support
this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token
filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the
search terms.
I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the
order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on
the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content).
I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They
use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture.
The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It
shows results based on content in the same way as the current version
does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the
file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it).
Resolves#32096
---------
Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
